The historic decision that reversed D.C.'s oppresive (and illegal) ban on firearms ownership 2 years ago is again back in front of our nation's highest court, this time to see if it is applicable to every citizen in every state. The previous decision was just applicable to D.C., which is a federal disctrict zoned and regulated by the federal government. This would "incorporate" the right to all US citizens.Check out the vid..
The quote that struck me odd was from Denis Henigan, the Brady Bastards lawyer..
"the Court implicitly recognized that there is still broad legislative authority to enact reasonable laws to reduce the risk from that right. And we hope the Court gives similar assurances in this case."
WTH does that mean? I know what it means, but we need to be protected from our rights? How about our right to be protected from being sickened to see our country's flag burned or to have feces thrown on it by somebody exercising their 1st Amendment right to free speech? Give me a freakin' break, that's the thing about standards....ther are just so damn many of them to choose from.....
Article from Fox News...
Posts
2 comments:
It means the anti's will twist and bend any ruling to their socialist agenda! Did you say you had some strippers for the K98?
B in Gahanna
Wasn't the Brady Law struck down as being unconstitutional? There was something they did that was unconstitutional.
Post a Comment